Relationship between Social Studies and the Social Sciences or other Disciplines
Social studies is a
discipline in which subjects like Political Science, Economics, Geography,
Anthropology, Sociology and even Psychology are distinctively studied. They are
policy sciences because they study and analyze the process of decision and choice
with reference to available relevant knowledge and data as aid in the solution
of peculiar and particular problems in the society. In this condition, human
beings are studied within a restricted perspective.
Political Science as a Social Science is concerned
with the study of the exercise of power. Hence, the discipline is studied
purposely to better understand the general principles on which government can
be carried out successfully. Students are exposed to those factors that impinge
on the everyday life of every single inhabitant of the world. Integration of
political science concepts in Social Studies provides students with the
opportunity of studying how people’s attitudes, idiosyncrasies and value
judgment can be influenced.
Concepts in Geography on
the other hand allows Social Studies students to draw upon social and physical
sciences while the students are studying distribution and spatial arrangements
of natural and human phenomena. The disciplines also afford the students the
chance to study the functional relationship between human beings and land
characters of areas and conditions as well as the processes of the earth’s
surface, that is, air, water and the terrain. Discipline of Geography can be
described as one that is capable of helping Social Studies students to develop
power of observation in field work and provides a context for understanding
regional inter-relationships in Social Studies context. An acquisition of
geographical knowledge and skill assists Social Studies students greatly in the
formation of enlightened opinions and making informed decisions on a wide range
of community, regional and global issues.
Anthropology: emphasizes more on human
evaluation and systematic comparative analysis of socio-cultural data of ethnic
groups. Hence, the concepts in anthropology avail Social Studies students the
opportunity to have key insights into and understanding of, what it takes to
become a human being. Concepts from this discipline encourage students to study
all aspects of a culture. Anthropology, therefore allows
students to collect data on all aspects of culture in terms of its history,
religion, geography, economy, technology and language.
Economics: the concepts enable the
students to see human behaviour from a unique perspective. They encourage them
to focus on how people try to satisfy their virtually unlimited wants with
limited resources. Hence, the acquisition of skills of how people could use
limited resources to produce, exchange and consumer goods and services becomes
a major rational for studying Economics concepts in Social Studies.
Sociology: the concepts are
considered in Social Studies on the assumption that individuals need group for
their survival, and that their behaviour is largely shaped by group norms and
sanctions. Students are afforded the opportunity of studying classes of
phenomena and their common characteristics. This encourages the students to
avoid moral judgments about classes, cultures and societies being studied
Thus, Social Studies tries to
integrate the knowledge of Social Sciences with various experiences of life in
an attempt to identify and provide solutions to societal problems necessary for
human survival.
One could therefore say that, while the
social sciences are concerned primarily with expanding the boundaries of
knowledge and developing highly specialized scholars in fields like Geography,
Economics, and Political Science, the Social Studies on the other hand is
concerned with wide dissemination of information, the development of social and
inquiry skills and the improvement of social attitudes as well as behaviours.
The purpose of Social Studies is not greatly concerned with learners acquiring
what is done in Social Sciences but primarily to enable learners use
information and knowledge to better understand the environment.
Hence, one could not say that
Social Science is Social Studies in totality or vice versa, rather Social
Studies could be said to begin where the Social Sciences end.
Social studies and Arts
It is however; feel that
connecting students to the Social Studies through Arts may bring help, similar
inspiration and emotion into the classroom. By means of the arts in Social
Studies, students connect to the topic under study in an emotion- filled genre.
The relationship between the Arts and the Social Studies could also be found in
the fact that when Arts are brought into Social Studies, they facilitate
learners’ ability to discover content and help them to interpret the past,
compare it with the present and gather implications for the future in order to
ensure human survival. There is also a relationship between Social Studies and
History as part of the Arts. They also assist in increasing learners’ awareness
level about people and the importance of human relationship.
TEACHING OF VALUES &
NORMS IN SOCIAL STUDIES
The three basic values are
the substantive,
behavioural and procedural values.
The substantive values, consisting of
instrumental and terminal values which are concerned with enduring issues of
life time – religion, capitalism, socialism, education, honour and glory etc.
However, because of the plural nature of Nigeria’s society and the fact that
particular substantive values may differ from one family to another, they are
better taught in the home and reinforced at school.
The behavioural values
involve the use and observance by the learners of specific rules to ensure
orderliness in the school and classroom. The extent to which a learner Obeys
these rules is a direct measure of the value he attaches to interpersonal
relationship, orderliness care of equipments and materials, the rule of law,
and institutional authority.
Procedural values include the use of the
process of logical reasoning, critical thinking, experimental and inquiry
method in the treatment of data and information. It should be clear from the
foregoing that both the behavioural and procedural values have to be taught
conscientiously and effectively as a prerequisite to
the creation of an enabling environment for successful teaching and learning to
take place. Another implication is that, in face of this unprecedented rapidity
of change, the primary school teacher of Social Studies can no longer rely
solely on the use of memorization, direct formal instruction, reading, and
other indoctrination techniques in the teaching and learning of values. The
point being made is that it is no more a simple matter to foster in children
the desirable attitudes and values. Firstly, the Social Studies teacher has to
be familiar with these values. There are three basic ones, namely, the
substantive, behavioural and procedural values. The substantive values,
consisting of instrumental and terminal values are concerned with enduring
issues of life time – religion, capitalism, socialism, education, honour and
glory etc.
However, because of the
plural nature of Nigeria’s society and the fact that particular Substantive
values may differ from one family to another; they are better taught in the
home and reinforced at school. The behavioural values involve the use and
observance by the learners of specific rules to ensure orderliness in the
school and classroom. The extent to which a learner obeys these rules is a
direct measure of the value he attaches to interpersonal relationship,
orderliness care of equipments and materials, the rule of law, and
institutional authority. Procedural values include the use of the process of
logical reasoning, critical thinking, experimental and inquiry method in the
treatment of data and information. It should be clear from the foregoing that
both the behavioural and procedural values have to be taught conscientiously
and effectively as a prerequisite to the creation of a conducive environment
for successful teaching and learning to take place.
DIFRENCE BETWEEN NORMS AND
VALUES
The
difference has to do with cultural norms. The term 'culture' refers
to attitudes and patterns of behavior in a given group. ‘Norm’ refers to
attitudes and behaviors that are considered normal, typical or average within
that group
Norms and
values are used interchangeably in our day-to-day discourse. But they are used
in specific terms when it comes to social scientist term. We can view social
norms as being standards, rules, guides and expectations for real behaviour,
meanwhile, values are said to be abstract conceptions of what is important and
worthwhile or what doing. Looking at honesty society sees it as being a general
value; it is expected that students should not cheat in exam or use such
material forbidden material in the examinations in this case it is a norm.
Values are
general guidelines, while norms are specific guidelines. Values are general
standards, which decide what is good and what is bad. Norms are rules and
expectations that specify how people should and should not behave in various
social conditions.
For one to
fully adapt in a particular value in a society there can various norms. Norms
are said to link values with real norms. In short, values are said to be ends
while norms are the means to achieve ends. Sometimes, values and norms of a
society conflict with each other.
NAME: ONYISHI DORIS CHINECHEREM
ReplyDeleteREG NO: 17109328
DEPARTMENT: POL SC/ENG
COURSE CODE: POL 212
COURSE TITLE: COMPARATIVE GOVERNMENT AND POLITICS
QUESTION: SUMMARY OF THE POLITICAL SYSTEM OF UNITED KINGDOM AND NIGERIA
POLITICAL SYSTEM OF UNITED KINGDOM
The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland is a constitutional monarchy. That is, it is a country governed by a king or queen who accepts the advice of a parliament. Second, it is a unitary state, as it unites four different countries.
A monarch in the UK reigns, but does not rule. Queen Elizabeth II is the head of the country as well as of fifteen other independent Commonwealth countries, which form British Commonwealth of Nations.
Government refers to the most powerful of the ministers, namely, the Prime Minister and the other members of the cabinet, who exercise executive power
The activities of Parliament in Britain are more or less the same as those of the parliament in any western democracy.
Britain is normally described as having a ´two-party system´. This is because members of just two parties normally occupy more than 85% of all of the seats in the House of Commons and one of them controls the government.
The federal government of Nigeria is composed of three distinct branches: legislative, executive, and judicial, whose powers are vested by the Constitution of Nigeria in the National Assembly, the President, and the federal courts, including the Supreme Court, respectively.
The law of Nigeria is based on the rule of law, the independence of the judiciary, and British common law (due to the long history of British colonial influence). The common law in the legal system is similar to common-law systems used in England and Wales and other Commonwealth countries.
The president is elected through universal suffrage. He or she is both the chief of state and head of government, heading the Federal Executive Council, or cabinet. The executive branch is divided into Federal Ministries, each headed by a minister appointed by the president.
The National Assembly of Nigeria has two chambers: the House of Representatives and the Senate. The House of Representatives is presided over by the Speaker of the House of Representatives. 108 members are elected for four-year terms in 36 three-seat constituencies, which correspond to the country's 36 states. One member is selected in the single-seat constituency of the federal capital.
The judicial branch consists of the Supreme Court of Nigeria, the Court of Appeals, the High Courts, and other trial courts such as the Magistrates', Customary, Sharia and other specialized courts. The National Judicial Council serves as an independent executive body, insulating the judiciary from the executive arm of government.
Tribal, religious, and regional differences have hindered the formation of a truly national Nigerian political party in Nigeria. Before 1966, the major parties were the Northern People's Congress (NPC)
The military of Nigeria has played a major role in the country's history, often seizing control of the country and ruling it for long periods of time. Its last period of rule ended in 1999, following the death of the leader of the previous military junta SaniAbacha in 1998.
SIMILIARITIES ON POLITICAL SYSTEM OF UNITED KINGDOM AND NIGERIA
1. Media in both Nigeria and Britain has quite often been generally free, with almost no administration control.
2. Both nations have solid multinationalism:
DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE POLITICAL SYSTEM OF UNITED KINGDOM AND NIGERIA
1. Nigeria contains a supporter client list framework called pre-bendalism, though Britain does not.
2. Britain has an unwritten constitution and capacities dependent on precedent-based law; Nigeria has a composed constitution.
NAME: ODO LOVETH CHINEDU
ReplyDeleteREG NO: 17109307
DEPARTMENT: POL SC/ENG
COURSE CODE: POL 212
COURSE TITLE: COMPARATIVE GOVERNMENT AND POLITICS
QUESTION: SUMMARY OF THE POLITICAL SYSTEM OF UNITED KINGDOM AND NIGERIA
POLITICAL SYSTEM OF UNITED KINGDOM
The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland is a constitutional monarchy. That is, it is a country governed by a king or queen who accepts the advice of a parliament. Second, it is a unitary state, as it unites four different countries.
A monarch in the UK reigns, but does not rule. Queen Elizabeth II is the head of the country as well as of fifteen other independent Commonwealth countries, which form British Commonwealth of Nations.
Government refers to the most powerful of the ministers, namely, the Prime Minister and the other members of the cabinet, who exercise executive power
The activities of Parliament in Britain are more or less the same as those of the parliament in any western democracy.
Britain is normally described as having a ´two-party system´. This is because members of just two parties normally occupy more than 85% of all of the seats in the House of Commons and one of them controls the government.
The federal government of Nigeria is composed of three distinct branches: legislative, executive, and judicial, whose powers are vested by the Constitution of Nigeria in the National Assembly, the President, and the federal courts, including the Supreme Court, respectively.
The law of Nigeria is based on the rule of law, the independence of the judiciary, and British common law (due to the long history of British colonial influence). The common law in the legal system is similar to common-law systems used in England and Wales and other Commonwealth countries.
The president is elected through universal suffrage. He or she is both the chief of state and head of government, heading the Federal Executive Council, or cabinet. The executive branch is divided into Federal Ministries, each headed by a minister appointed by the president.
The National Assembly of Nigeria has two chambers: the House of Representatives and the Senate. The House of Representatives is presided over by the Speaker of the House of Representatives. 108 members are elected for four-year terms in 36 three-seat constituencies, which correspond to the country's 36 states. One member is selected in the single-seat constituency of the federal capital.
The judicial branch consists of the Supreme Court of Nigeria, the Court of Appeals, the High Courts, and other trial courts such as the Magistrates', Customary, Sharia and other specialized courts. The National Judicial Council serves as an independent executive body, insulating the judiciary from the executive arm of government.
Tribal, religious, and regional differences have hindered the formation of a truly national Nigerian political party in Nigeria. Before 1966, the major parties were the Northern People's Congress (NPC)
The military of Nigeria has played a major role in the country's history, often seizing control of the country and ruling it for long periods of time. Its last period of rule ended in 1999, following the death of the leader of the previous military junta SaniAbacha in 1998.
SIMILIARITIES ON POLITICAL SYSTEM OF UNITED KINGDOM AND NIGERIA
1. Media in both Nigeria and Britain has quite often been generally free, with almost no administration control.
2. Both nations have solid multinationalism:
DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE POLITICAL SYSTEM OF UNITED KINGDOM AND NIGERIA
1. Nigeria contains a supporter client list framework called pre-bendalism, though Britain does not.
2. Britain has an unwritten constitution and capacities dependent on precedent-based law; Nigeria has a composed constitution.
NAME: ONYISHI OLUCHI MARYANN
ReplyDeleteREG NO: 17109329
DEPARTMENT: POL SC/ENG
COURSE CODE: POL 212
COURSE TITLE: COMPARATIVE GOVERNMENT AND POLITICS
QUESTION: SUMMARY OF THE POLITICAL SYSTEM OF UNITED KINGDOM AND NIGERIA
POLITICAL SYSTEM OF UNITED KINGDOM
The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland is a constitutional monarchy. That is, it is a country governed by a king or queen who accepts the advice of a parliament. Second, it is a unitary state, as it unites four different countries.
A monarch in the UK reigns, but does not rule. Queen Elizabeth II is the head of the country as well as of fifteen other independent Commonwealth countries, which form British Commonwealth of Nations.
Government refers to the most powerful of the ministers, namely, the Prime Minister and the other members of the cabinet, who exercise executive power
The activities of Parliament in Britain are more or less the same as those of the parliament in any western democracy.
Britain is normally described as having a ´two-party system´. This is because members of just two parties normally occupy more than 85% of all of the seats in the House of Commons and one of them controls the government.
The federal government of Nigeria is composed of three distinct branches: legislative, executive, and judicial, whose powers are vested by the Constitution of Nigeria in the National Assembly, the President, and the federal courts, including the Supreme Court, respectively.
The law of Nigeria is based on the rule of law, the independence of the judiciary, and British common law (due to the long history of British colonial influence). The common law in the legal system is similar to common-law systems used in England and Wales and other Commonwealth countries.
The president is elected through universal suffrage. He or she is both the chief of state and head of government, heading the Federal Executive Council, or cabinet. The executive branch is divided into Federal Ministries, each headed by a minister appointed by the president.
The National Assembly of Nigeria has two chambers: the House of Representatives and the Senate. The House of Representatives is presided over by the Speaker of the House of Representatives. 108 members are elected for four-year terms in 36 three-seat constituencies, which correspond to the country's 36 states. One member is selected in the single-seat constituency of the federal capital.
The judicial branch consists of the Supreme Court of Nigeria, the Court of Appeals, the High Courts, and other trial courts such as the Magistrates', Customary, Sharia and other specialized courts. The National Judicial Council serves as an independent executive body, insulating the judiciary from the executive arm of government.
Tribal, religious, and regional differences have hindered the formation of a truly national Nigerian political party in Nigeria. Before 1966, the major parties were the Northern People's Congress (NPC)
The military of Nigeria has played a major role in the country's history, often seizing control of the country and ruling it for long periods of time. Its last period of rule ended in 1999, following the death of the leader of the previous military junta SaniAbacha in 1998.
SIMILIARITIES ON POLITICAL SYSTEM OF UNITED KINGDOM AND NIGERIA
1. Media in both Nigeria and Britain has quite often been generally free, with almost no administration control.
2. Both nations have solid multinationalism:
DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE POLITICAL SYSTEM OF UNITED KINGDOM AND NIGERIA
1. Nigeria contains a supporter client list framework called pre-bendalism, though Britain does not.
2. Britain has an unwritten constitution and capacities dependent on precedent-based law; Nigeria has a composed constitution.
NAME: ODOH, HAPPINESS UKAMAKA
ReplyDeleteREG NO: 17109310
DEPARTMENT: POL SC/ENG
COURSE CODE: POL 212
COURSE TITLE: COMPARATIVE GOVERNMENT AND POLITICS
QUESTION: SUMMARY OF THE POLITICAL SYSTEM OF UNITED KINGDOM AND NIGERIA
POLITICAL SYSTEM OF UNITED KINGDOM
The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland is a constitutional monarchy. That is, it is a country governed by a king or queen who accepts the advice of a parliament. Second, it is a unitary state, as it unites four different countries.
A monarch in the UK reigns, but does not rule. Queen Elizabeth II is the head of the country as well as of fifteen other independent Commonwealth countries, which form British Commonwealth of Nations.
Government refers to the most powerful of the ministers, namely, the Prime Minister and the other members of the cabinet, who exercise executive power
The activities of Parliament in Britain are more or less the same as those of the parliament in any western democracy.
Britain is normally described as having a ´two-party system´. This is because members of just two parties normally occupy more than 85% of all of the seats in the House of Commons and one of them controls the government.
The federal government of Nigeria is composed of three distinct branches: legislative, executive, and judicial, whose powers are vested by the Constitution of Nigeria in the National Assembly, the President, and the federal courts, including the Supreme Court, respectively.
The law of Nigeria is based on the rule of law, the independence of the judiciary, and British common law (due to the long history of British colonial influence). The common law in the legal system is similar to common-law systems used in England and Wales and other Commonwealth countries.
The president is elected through universal suffrage. He or she is both the chief of state and head of government, heading the Federal Executive Council, or cabinet. The executive branch is divided into Federal Ministries, each headed by a minister appointed by the president.
The National Assembly of Nigeria has two chambers: the House of Representatives and the Senate. The House of Representatives is presided over by the Speaker of the House of Representatives. 108 members are elected for four-year terms in 36 three-seat constituencies, which correspond to the country's 36 states. One member is selected in the single-seat constituency of the federal capital.
The judicial branch consists of the Supreme Court of Nigeria, the Court of Appeals, the High Courts, and other trial courts such as the Magistrates', Customary, Sharia and other specialized courts. The National Judicial Council serves as an independent executive body, insulating the judiciary from the executive arm of government.
Tribal, religious, and regional differences have hindered the formation of a truly national Nigerian political party in Nigeria. Before 1966, the major parties were the Northern People's Congress (NPC)
The military of Nigeria has played a major role in the country's history, often seizing control of the country and ruling it for long periods of time. Its last period of rule ended in 1999, following the death of the leader of the previous military junta SaniAbacha in 1998.
SIMILIARITIES ON POLITICAL SYSTEM OF UNITED KINGDOM AND NIGERIA
1. Media in both Nigeria and Britain has quite often been generally free, with almost no administration control.
2. Both nations have solid multinationalism:
DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE POLITICAL SYSTEM OF UNITED KINGDOM AND NIGERIA
1. Nigeria contains a supporter client list framework called pre-bendalism, though Britain does not.
2. Britain has an unwritten constitution and capacities dependent on precedent-based law; Nigeria has a composed constitution.
NAME: ODOH EMMANUELLA CHIBUZOR
ReplyDeleteDEPARTMENT: ECONOMICS/ POL SC
REG NO: 17109174
COURSE CODE: POL 212, LEVEL:200
COURSE TITLE: COMPARATIVE GOVERNMENT AND POLITICS
QUESTION: COMPARE THE POLITICAL SYSTEM OF NIGERIA AND FRANCE.
POLITICAL SYSTEM OF NIGERIA
From 11001400, major African civilizations blossomed around the Niger River. Europeans appeared in the 15th and 16th centuries and established the slave trade. By the end of the 19th century, the British colonized the coastal areas, began to penetrate inland, and established a protectorate over Northern Nigeria by 1900. The British controlled Nigeria through a divide-and-rule method, pitting the various ethnic groups against each other. In the south, the British introduced Christianity, primarily to the Ibo.
After a half century of British rule, Nigeria became fully independent on 1 October 1960. It became a federal republic in 1963 with the country divided into three states based on ethnicities: the Northern Region, the Western Region, and the Eastern Region. During the 1960s, leaders of the different states threatened secession from the federation. By 1966, the First Republic ended with a military coup. Subsequently, the Eastern Region declared its independence as the Republic of Biafra. In the ensuing civil war, the federal government blockaded Biafra and sent troops to reunite the country by force. During the three-year civil war, an estimated two million people died from mass starvation, mostly Christian Ibos.
As Africas most populous country, oil-rich Nigeria ranks with South Africa as one of the most influential countries on the continent. Since its return to democracy in 1999, Nigeria has made some progress on strengthening government institutions and fighting the corruption engendered by its oil wealth. But political violence ahead of April elections, the fragility of the federalist system, and continued clashes caused by pervasive ethnic and religious tensions raise questions about Nigerias ability to continue on its path toward good governance. The federal government of Nigeria is composed of three distinct branches: legislative, executive, and judicial, whose powers are vested by the Constitution of Nigeria in the National Assembly, the President, and the federal courts, including the Supreme Court, respectively.
POLITICAL SYSTEM OF FRANCE
France is a sovereign country in Europe, with a total land area of approximately 549,970 sq km. France today is one of the most modern countries in the world and is a leader among European nations. It plays an influential global role as a permanent member of the United Nations Security Council, NATO, the G-8, the G-20, the EU and other multilateral organizations. France rejoined NATO's integrated military command structure in 2009, reversing DE GAULLE's 1966 decision to take French forces out of NATO. Since 1958, it has constructed a hybrid presidential-parliamentary governing system resistant to the instabilities experienced in earlier, more purely parliamentary administrations. In recent decades, its reconciliation and cooperation with Germany have proved central to the economic integration of Europe, including the introduction of a common currency, the euro, in January 1999. In the early 21st century, five French overseas entities - French Guiana, Guadeloupe, Martinique, Mayotte, and Reunion - became French regions and were made part of France proper.
Rhe French political system has evolved through five major constitutional models as follows:
First Republic: 1792-1804
Second Republic: 1848-1852
Third Republic: 1870-1940
Fourth Republic: 1946-1958
Fifth Republic: 1958-present